When making suggestions, modal verbs can be very useful.

做建议时情态动词有用。

Is it because modal verbs don't change their form, but " have to" does?

是不是因为情态动词不改变自身形式，但是 “have to” 会改变？

So you already know I'm sure about superlatives and modals of necessity.

你已经知道「最高级」和「情态动词」的重要性。

Like myself, the modal verb " will" is a useful thing to have around.

就像我自一样，情态动词 “will” 用途广。

But why is " have to" different from other modal verbs?

但是为什么 “have to” 和其他情态动词不一样呢？

All modal verbs are followed by a bare infinitive verb so there is no difference.

所有情态动词后面都是接动词原形，所有没有不同。

That handy modal so often used for advice!

这个简单的情态动词很用于建议！

Should is a modal verb and so has no past form.

Should 是一个情态动词，所以没有过去式。

I tried to teach something about modal verbs.

我试着教了他们一些关于情态动词的内容。

Look for modal verbs like 'could', 'might' or 'must'.

寻找像“可能”、“也许”或者“一定”这种情态动词。

We often use the words 'maybe' and 'perhaps' without a modal to express uncertainty.

我们经用maybe和perhaps而不是情态动词表达不确定性。

But again, " maybe" is an adverb, not a modal.

但是，" maybe" 是一个副词，不是情态词。

The modal verbs " must" and " have to" are very close in meaning.

情态动词" must" 和" have to" 的意思十分相近。

You may remember that the verb " should" is a modal verb.

你可能还记得动词" should" 是情态动词。

So we can replace 'would have' with other modals like 'might' and 'could'.

所以我们就可以用其他的模态词，比如说“might”和“could”来代替“would have”。

Of is a preposition and it just doesn't appear with modal verbs in this way.

Of 是一个介词，它不会以这种方式出现在情态动词中。

It can also be a modal auxiliary verb like can or will or should.

也可以是像can，will或者should这种情态动词。

So we use the modal verb 'would' to show that we're imagining the result.

所以我们会使用情态动词“would”来显示我们在想象结果。

These days we are more likely to use modal verbs such as 'should' or 'would'.

现在我们更多的时候是用情态动词should和would。

Why don't we cover the modal " WOULD" to make requests?

我们为什么不谈谈情态动词 WOULD 用做表示请求的用法呢？